Turin Shroud Copy 'Proves Relic Is A Fake'

[Dudette]

An Italian scientist says he has reproduced the Shroud of Turin - and therefore proved the relic is a medieval fake.

More... (http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Shroud-Of-Turin-Scientist-Luigi-Garlaschelli-Reproduces-Relic-And-Claims-Hes-Proved-Its-A-Fake/Article/200910115400306?f=rss)

[Muddy]

Ya think?

[Halo]

An Italian scientist says he has reproduced the Shroud of Turin - and therefore proved the relic is a medieval fake.


Producing something "which has the same characteristics as the Shroud" does not prove the relic is a fake, only that you have produced something which has the same characteristics as the Shroud.

Shroud: such a great word. :3rolleyes:

[Ferre]

Do you mean that Criss Angel did not prove that Jesus really existed? :sqerr:

sBQLq2VmZcA

[Muddy]

Shroud: such a great word. :3rolleyes:

It is isn't it? Even if you miss-use it.

"That's it buddy! Now I'm gonna shroud your clock!"

"Hey baby, wanna shroud?"

"Well doc, it's a little embarrassing...but if you look just under the scrotum, I think I have shrouds."

[ewomack]

Wow... Dudette is smart, too... I wonder if she'd like some chocolate crepes?

[ewomack]

The shroud has never been authentic enough to call a fake. That's like calling the shriveled hands and pieces of clothing supposedly from saints "fake." They never reached a level of credibility to even warrant such analysis.